Journal of Orthopedics and Joint Surgery

Register      Login

VOLUME 3 , ISSUE 2 ( July-December, 2021 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Clinical Outcome after Hemiarthroplasty among Patients with Fracture Neck of Femur in South Indian Population

Vetrivel Chezian Sengodan, Suresh Kumar Vadivelu

Keywords : Elderly, Femoral neck fracture, Hemiarthroplasty

Citation Information : Sengodan VC, Vadivelu SK. Clinical Outcome after Hemiarthroplasty among Patients with Fracture Neck of Femur in South Indian Population. 2021; 3 (2):65-69.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10079-1037

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 22-09-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; The Author(s).


Background: Femoral neck fractures in the elderly are serious injuries, often occurring in the terminal years of life and they have a major impact on society, our healthcare system, and the cost of care. It has a high incidence rate and complications. A successful surgery at the hip joint should provide a painless and stable hip. Hemiarthroplasty is the common method of treating displaced femoral neck fractures in Garden's type III and IV in the elderly. This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcome and quality of life following hemiarthroplasty. Materials and methods: It is a retrospective study including a total of 101 patients who underwent hemiarthroplasty (cemented/uncemented) using unipolar or bipolar prosthesis due to femoral neck fracture at the Institute of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Coimbatore Medical College Hospital, Coimbatore, during the period of 2 years between 2017 and 2019. In this analytical retrospective study, we studied several variables including age, sex, socioeconomic status, medical comorbidities, clinical outcome, postoperative complications, quality of life, frequency of follow-up, and mortality. Results: In our study, most of the patients were in the age-group of 60–70 years with a mean age of 65 years. This study was carried out on 43 males and 58 females. There was no intraoperative complication/mortality. A total of 21 patients had complications. These were (a) posterior dislocation (3), (b) aseptic loosening (1), (c) periprosthetic fracture (1), (d) superficial infection (11), (e) deep infection (1), and other minor complications like persistent hip pain and muscle wasting. The mortality rate was about 23.7% at 1-year follow-up. Conclusion: The overall complications following hemiarthroplasty were acceptable. The immediate complications rate was about 8.9% and the late complication rate was about 17.8%. Targeted medical intervention that focuses upon susceptible patient groups may reduce morbidity, mortality, and improve survival.

  1. Ekman E, Nurmi H, Reito A, et al. Complications following 250 cemented modular hip hemiarthroplasties. SJS Scand J Surg 2019;108(4):321–328. DOI: 10.1177/1457496918812226
  2. Smith T, Pelpola K, Ball M, et al. Pre-operative indicators for mortality following hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Age Ageing 2014;43(4):464–471. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afu065.
  3. Moja L, Piatti A, Pecoraro V, et al. Timing matters in hip fracture surgery: patients operated within 48 hours have better outcomes. A meta-analysis and meta-regression of over 190,000 patients. PLoS One 2012;7(10):e46175. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046175.
  4. Keating JF, Grant A, Masson M, et al. Randomized comparison of reduction and fixation, bipolar hemiarthroplasty, and total hip arthroplasty. Treatment of displaced intracapsular hip fractures in healthy older patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88(2):249–260. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00215.
  5. Saberi S, Arabzadeh A, Khomeisi B, et al. Early complications following Bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture in elderly patients. Acad J Surg 2014;1(3–4):45–48.
  6. Bucholz R, Court-Brown C, Heckman J, et al. Rockwood and Green's Fractures in Adults, vol. 2 7th ed., Wolters Kluwer Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010. pp. 1561–1596.
  7. Schneppendahl J, Grassmann JP, Petrov V, et al. Decreasing mortality after femoral neck fracture treated with bipolar hemiarthroplasty during the last twenty years. Int Orthop 2012;36(10):2021–2026. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-012-1600-z.
  8. Lim YW, Kwon SY, Han SK, et al. Postoperative mortality and factors related to mortality after bipolar hemiarthroplasty in patients with femoral neck fractures. J Arthrop 2009;24(8):1277–1280. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.06.019.
  9. D'Angelo F, Giudici M, Molina M, et al. Mortality rate after hip hemiarthroplasty: analysis of risk factors in 299 consecutives cases. J Orthop Traumatol 2005;6(3):111–116. DOI: 10.1007/s10195-005-0093-6.
  10. Eiskjaer S, Østgård SE. Risk factors influencing mortality after bipolar hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of fracture of the femoral neck. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991(270):295–300. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199109000-00039.
  11. Clark D, Ahmed A, Baxendale B, et al. Cardiac output during hemiarthroplasty of the hip: a prospective, controlled trial of cemented and uncemented prostheses. Bone Joint J 2001;83(3):414–418. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.83b3.11477.
  12. Figved W, Opland V, Frihagen F, et al. Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467(9):2426–2435. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008- 0672-y.
  13. Antonelli B, Chen AF. Reducing the risk of infection after total joint arthroplasty: preoperative optimization. Arthroplasty 2019;1(1):4. DOI: 10.1186/s42836-019-0003-7.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.