Journal of Orthopedics and Joint Surgery

Register      Login

VOLUME 6 , ISSUE 2 ( July-December, 2024 ) > List of Articles

CLINICAL TECHNIQUE

Neglected Forearm Fractures and Its Outcome Following Mediolateral Plate Osteosynthesis: A Retrospective Case Series

Ashok T Ramanathan

Keywords : Forearm fracture nonunion, (Medial ulnar and lateral radius concept) Medial ulnar, Neglected forearm fractures, Radius bow restoration, Lateral radius plating

Citation Information : Ramanathan AT. Neglected Forearm Fractures and Its Outcome Following Mediolateral Plate Osteosynthesis: A Retrospective Case Series. J Orth Joint Surg 2024; 6 (2):161-166.

DOI: 10.5005/jojs-10079-1145

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 14-06-2024

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2024; The Author(s).


Abstract

Background: Displaced both bone forearm injuries are essential fractures for fixation. It is not uncommon in certain parts of developing countries for indigenous bone setters to extend their misguided treatment that results in nonunion or malunion of these fractures. The masterly neglect by the patients and the lawful mismanagement by the bone setters cause additional stiffness of the adjacent joints and affect the forearm rotational functions even in the absence of neurovascular compromise. Aim: To assess the clinical and radiological outcome of neglected bone forearm fractures treated with delayed surgical fixation by medial ulnar and lateral radius (MEULAR) plate fixation technique. Materials and methods: The retrospective series includes 11 cases of neglected forearm diaphyseal fractures from January 2019 to November 2022. The mean age in this study group is 32.4 years, with an average time delay of 3.8 months in presentation for the definitive procedure. In these cases, fixation was done using a dynamic compression or locking plate on the medial side of the ulna and lateral side of the radius after open fibroosteoclysis. Both functional and radiological outcomes were assessed with minimum follow-up till the fracture union. Anderson's criteria was used for functional assessment and radiological assessment of radius using bow magnitude, bow percentage and bow ratio. Results: Fracture healing was achieved in all our cases. Functional results were excellent in nine cases and satisfactory in two cases with extended rehabilitation. Restoration of radial bow and interosseous space was feasible with delayed plate osteosynthesis. Conclusion: Delayed fixation in neglected forearm fractures with the MEULAR concept achieves fracture healing with good to excellent functional outcomes. Despite the operative complexity of open osteoclasis or the need for bone grafting, the anatomical radial bow can be restored in the absence of forearm cross-union.


HTML PDF Share
  1. Jupiter JB, Fernandez DL, Levin LS, et al. Reconstruction of posttraumatic disorders of the forearm. Instr Course Lect 2010;59:283–293. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200911000-00027
  2. Nagy L, Jankauskas L, Dumont CE. Correction of forearm malunion guided by the preoperative complaint. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008;466(6):1419–1428. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0234-3
  3. Stattin K, Hållmarker U, Ärnlöv J, et al. Decreased hip, lower leg, and humeral fractures but increased forearm fractures in highly active individuals. J Bone Miner Res 2018;33(10):1842–1850. DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.3476
  4. Morrey BF, Askew LJ, An KN, et al. A biomechanical study of normal functional elbow motion. J Bone Joint Surg 1981;63(6):872–877.
  5. Schemitsch EH, Richards RR. The effect of malunion on functional outcome after plate fixation of fractures of both bones of the forearm in adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992;74(7):1068–1078.
  6. Dumont CE, Thalmann R, Macy JC. The effect of rotational malunion of the radius and the ulna on supination and pronation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002;84(7):1070–1074. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.84b7.12593
  7. Muller ME, Allgower M, Willenegger H. Technique of internal fixation of fractures. New York; Springer-Verlag; 1965.
  8. Tarr RR, Garfinkel AI, Sarmiento A. The effects of angular and rotational deformities of both bones of the forearm: an in vitro study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1984;66(1):65–70.
  9. Richard MJ, Ruch DS, Aldridge JM 3rd. Malunions and nonunions of the forearm. Hand Clin 2007;23(2):235–43, vii. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2007.02.005
  10. Anderson LD, Sisk D, Tooms RE, et al. Compression-plate fixation in acute diaphyseal fractures of the radius and the ulna. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1975;57(3):287–287.
  11. Perren SM, Boitzy A. Cellular differentiation and bone biomechanics during the consolidation of a fracture. Anat Clin 1978;28:13–28. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B7.36061
  12. Elliott DS, Newman KJ, Forward DP, et al. A unified theory of bone healing and nonunion: BHN theory. Bone Joint J 2016;98-B(7):884–891. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B7.36061
  13. Panteli M, Pountos I, Jones E, et al. Biological and molecular profile of fracture non-union tissue: current insights. J Cell Mol Med 2015;19(4):685–713. DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.12532
  14. Rehman S, Sokunbi G. Intramedullary fixation of forearm fractures. Hand Clin 2010;26(3):391–401, vii. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2010.04.002
  15. Firl M, Wünsch L. Measurement of bowing of the radius. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004;86(7):1047–1049. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.86b7.14294
  16. Haseeb M, Muzafar K, Ghani A, et al. A fresh look at radial shaft fracture fixation: the lateral approach to the radius. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2018;26(2):2309499018780871. DOI: 10.1177/2309499018780871
  17. R RP, Gupta V, Soni R, et al. Radial bow- its importance in return of rotation after fixation of fracture both bones forearm in adults. Int J Orthop Sci 2018;4(4):68–72. DOI: 10.22271/ortho.2018.v4.i4b.15
  18. Lee SK, Kim KJ, Lee JW, et al. Plate osteosynthesis versus intramedullary nailing for both forearm bones fractures. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2014;24(5):769–776. DOI: 10.1007/s00590-013-1242-x
  19. Daruwalla JS. A study of radioulnar movements following fractures of the forearm in children. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1979;(139):114–120. DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000999
  20. Hreha J, Congiusta DV, Ahmed IH, et al. What is the normal ulnar bow in adult patients? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2020;478(1):136–141. DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000999
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.