Journal of Orthopedics and Joint Surgery

Register      Login

VOLUME 4 , ISSUE 2 ( July-December, 2022 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Computed Tomography-based Morphometric Analysis of Dorsal Vertebral Pedicle in South Indian Population

Vetrivel Chezian Sengodan, Pranesh K Manivel, Jenny J Pynadath

Keywords : Anatomy, Morphometry, Screw instrumentation, Spinal surgery, Thoracic pedicle

Citation Information : Sengodan VC, Manivel PK, Pynadath JJ. Computed Tomography-based Morphometric Analysis of Dorsal Vertebral Pedicle in South Indian Population. 2022; 4 (2):74-80.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10079-1101

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 31-05-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2022; The Author(s).


Abstract

Background: The pedicle of the thoracic vertebrae (dorsal pedicle) is a cylindrical anatomical structure that bridges between the vertebral body and posterior elements. Hence, pedicle screw fixation allows stable-3-column fixation of the spine which is biomechanically superior to other methods of spinal fixation. The dorsal pedicle has a complex anatomy and its morphological characteristics vary between different ethnic populations. Hence, the present study was planned to assess the morphological characteristics of dorsal pedicle in our local population. Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis of 648 dorsal vertebrae of 54 patients (40 males and 14 females), who were all over 20 years of age was performed and compared with previously reported studies using established methods. Results: Dorsal pedicle morphometric parameters showed significant variations between gender and different ethnic population despite having a similar general pattern. Smaller pedicle width, axis length, and medial angulation of transverse pedicle angle were unique to the South Indian population in this study cohort. Females had smaller pedicle sizes when compared to males in this study. Conclusion: The morphological differences suggest caution needs to be taken for transpedicular fixation in the Indian population with Western surgical instruments, especially in the mid-thoracic region and particularly in South Indian females who have significantly smaller and shorter pedicles.


PDF Share
  1. Panjabi MM, O'Holleran JD, Crisco JJ, et al. Complexity of the thoracic spine pedicle anatomy. Eur Spine J 1997;6(1):19–24. DOI: 10.1007/BF01676570
  2. Berlemann U, Cripton PA, Rincon L, et al. Pull-out strength of pedicle hooks with fixation screws: influence of screw length and angulation. Eur Spine J 1996;5(1):71–73. DOI: 10.1007/BF00307831
  3. Lien SB, Liou NH, Wu SS. Analysis of anatomic morphometry of the pedicles and the safe zone for through-pedicle procedures in the thoracic and lumbar spine. Eur Spine J 2007;16(8):1215–1222. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-006-0245-2
  4. Kaur K, Singh R, Prasath V, et al. Computed tomographic-based morphometric study of thoracic spine and its relevance to anaesthetic and spinal surgical procedures. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2016;7(2):101–108. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2015.12.002
  5. Olsewski JM, Simmons EH, Kallen FC, et al. Morphometry of the lumbar spine: anatomical perspectives related to transpedicular fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990;72(4):541–549.
  6. Berry JL, Moran JM, Berg WS, et al. A morphometric study of human lumbar and selected thoracic vertebrae. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1987;12:362–367. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198705000-00010
  7. Singh R, Srivastva SK, Prasath CSV, et al. Morphometric measurements of cadaveric thoracic spine in Indian population and its clinical applications. Asian Spine J 2011;5(1):20–34. DOI: 10.4184/asj.2011.5.1.20
  8. Datir SP, Mitra SR. Morphometric study of the thoracic vertebral pedicle in an indian population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004;29(11):1174–1181. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200406010-00004
  9. Acharya S, Dorje T, Srivastava A. Lower dorsal and lumbar pedicle morphometry in Indian population: a study of four hundred fifty vertebrae. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010;35(10):E378–384. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cb7f2b
  10. Verma V, Santoshi J A, Jain V, et al. Thoracic pedicle morphometry of dry vertebral columns in relation to trans-pedicular fixation: a cross-sectional study from central India. Cureus 2020;12(5):e8148. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.8148
  11. Pai BS, Nirmala GS, Muralimohan S, et al. Morphometric analysis of the thoracic pedicle: an anatomico-radiological study. Neurol India 2010;58(2):122–136. DOI: 10.4103/0028-3886.63808
  12. Shetty A, Avadhani R, Mahesha KB, et al. Thoracic pedicle morphometry study on cadaver and CT scan with its clinical applications. Int J Anat Res 2019;7(1.1):6089–6100. DOI: 10.16965/ijar.2018.414
  13. Gangadhara G. “Determination of transpedicular screw parameters with the help of pedicle morphometry of thoracic vertebrae for safe transpedicular screw fixation - a cadaveric study”. J Evol Med Dent Sci 2013;2(36):6807–6815. DOI: 10.14260/JEMDS/1216
  14. Tan SH, Teo EC, Chua HC. Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy of cervical, thoracic and lumbar vertebrae of Chinese Singaporeans. Eur Spine J 2004;13:137–146. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-003-0586-z
  15. Soh TLT, Kho KC, Lim ZK, et al. Morphological parameters of the thoracic pedicle in an asian population: a magnetic resonance imaging–based study of 3324 pedicles. Global Spine J 2021;11(4): 437–441. DOI: 10.1177/2192568220906137
  16. Hou S, Hu R, Shi Y. Pedicle morphology of the lower thoracic and lumbar spine in a Chinese population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1993;18(13):1850–1855. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199310000-00021
  17. Kretzer RM, Chaput C, Sciubba DM, et al. A computed tomography-based morphometric study of thoracic pedicle anatomy in a random United States trauma population. J Neurosurg Spine 2011;14(2): 235–243. DOI: 10.3171/2010.9.SPINE1043
  18. Zindrick MR, Wiltse LL, Doornik A, et al. Analysis of the morphometric characteristics of the thoracic and lumbar pedicles. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1987;12(2):160–166. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198703000-00012
  19. Solitro GF, Whitlock K, Amirouche F, et al. Currently adopted criteria for pedicle screw diameter selection. Int J Spine Surg 2019;13(2): 132–145. DOI: 10.14444/6018
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.